Can a single leader transform a region, or does true progress require collective effort? This is the question at the heart of our conversation with Steven Klukowski (SK), who sat down with Dawid Gertze (DG), the newly appointed governor of the //Kharas region, to discuss his ambitious vision for development. With just over three months in office, DG is clear: 'Development should be a collective agenda,' but only if all stakeholders are willing to join him in this endeavor.
But here's where it gets controversial... While DG’s approach emphasizes collaboration, his methods and priorities are already sparking debate. From his bold statements about accountability to his plans for resource ownership, DG is not afraid to challenge the status quo. Let’s dive into the interview and explore the key points that could shape the future of //Kharas.
SK: During your inaugural address, you stated, 'I hate people only making noise and doing nothing practical or noticeable.' How does this philosophy guide your leadership style, especially when working with public and private stakeholders?
DG: My point is simple: talking alone won’t solve problems. I’m committed to substantive dialogue—where citizens don’t just voice complaints but also propose solutions. After all, they understand their challenges better than anyone. For instance, when addressing unemployment, I’ve encouraged community leaders to identify local industries that can be revived rather than relying solely on government intervention. This approach ensures everyone is an active participant in our progress.
SK: You also mentioned, 'If stakeholders do not come to my office, I will visit them.' Has this strategy proven effective so far?
DG: Absolutely. I can’t wait for people to come to me. Instead, I’ve taken the initiative to visit traditional authorities and communities like Aus to understand their needs firsthand. This grassroots approach has already helped me identify key issues, such as the lack of access to clean water in rural areas, which we’re now working to address.
And this is the part most people miss... DG’s proactive stance isn’t just about accessibility; it’s about building trust in a region where past leadership may have fallen short. By showing up in person, he’s signaling that his administration is committed to inclusivity.
SK: The ruling party, Landless Peoples Movement (LPM), has had a complicated relationship with previous governors. How are you navigating this dynamic, and what’s your working relationship with the councilors like?
DG: While I can’t speak much to past tensions, I’ve reached out to LPM leadership to foster a unified political platform. Here’s the bold part: I believe political affiliation shouldn’t hinder our ability to serve the community. For example, the //Kharas regional council chairperson often steps in for me at events, demonstrating that we’re aligned in our goals, even if our methods differ. But let’s be honest—this level of cooperation isn’t always easy. What do you think? Can political rivals truly work together for the greater good?
SK: President Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah tasked you with uniting residents. How are you tackling this challenge?
DG: My strategy is to listen and connect. Whether it’s citizens, politicians, traditional leaders, or business owners, I’m bringing everyone to the table to address our shared challenges. Racial, political, and personal differences must take a backseat if we’re to move forward. For instance, I’m working with traditional authorities to resolve leadership succession disputes, ensuring we stand united as a nation. But here’s the question: Is unity enough, or do we need systemic changes to address deeper divides?
SK: //Kharas is rich in resources yet struggles with high poverty levels. What interventions will your office implement to turn this around?
DG: We can’t continue with business as usual. The bold move here is resource ownership. We must take control of our resources and empower ourselves economically. Additionally, we’re exploring untapped opportunities, like promoting eco-tourism in our pristine landscapes. But success hinges on one thing: unity in purpose. Without it, even the best plans will fall short.
SK: With oil, natural gas, and green hydrogen projects on the horizon, how will you ensure local communities benefit?
DG: We’re already prioritizing learners from the southern regions for energy-related studies, thanks to political advocacy. Procurement processes will favor local entrepreneurs, and employment opportunities will target unemployed residents in //Kharas and Hardap. But here’s the controversial part: While inclusivity is key, how do we balance local priorities with national economic goals? Is it fair to prioritize certain regions over others?
SK: Your plan to open a youth desk is promising. How will this benefit young people?
DG: The youth desk is already taking shape, with an officer from the Ministry of Youth seconded to my office. This initiative will provide career guidance, skills training, and mentorship programs, ensuring young people have the tools to succeed. For example, we’re partnering with local businesses to offer internships in emerging sectors like renewable energy.
SK: Unoccupied resettlement farms remain a challenge. What progress has been made?
DG: This is a pressing issue. If left unaddressed, the government could reclaim this land. Bureaucracy has slowed allocation, but we’re developing streamlined processes to place more beneficiaries on these farms. The counterpoint here is: While speeding up allocation is crucial, how do we ensure these farms are productive and not just occupied? Should we pair new farmers with experienced mentors?
SK: Speaking of mentorship, you’ve suggested white commercial farmers train communal and resettled farmers. Has this initiative begun?
DG: I’m actively engaging with white farmers’ associations to share their expertise. As outlined in the SWAPO manifesto and NDP6, agriculture is vital to our economy. By bridging the knowledge gap, we can uplift communal and resettled farmers. But this raises a question: Is this collaboration enough, or do we need policy reforms to address land inequality?
Final Thought: DG’s vision for //Kharas is ambitious, but its success depends on collective effort and difficult conversations. What’s your take? Can his approach bridge divides and drive progress, or are there deeper issues at play? Share your thoughts in the comments—let’s keep the dialogue going!
